<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Why, That's Delightful!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Graham Linehan's Hompendium of Dorithies.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 00:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Proceed by B'dum B'dum</title>
		<link>http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6764</link>
		<dc:creator>B'dum B'dum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 22:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6764</guid>
		<description>Just after reading the start of the article and had to stop so I could beat my brother in order to reduce how much it had annoyed me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just after reading the start of the article and had to stop so I could beat my brother in order to reduce how much it had annoyed me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proceed by David K</title>
		<link>http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6762</link>
		<dc:creator>David K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 21:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6762</guid>
		<description>That Alan Partridge article was lame. At absolutely no point was it suggested he was being followed by a camera crew.
I have to say I like Keith Olbermann's presenting style. How many times would you say he's watched Good Night and Good Luck?
A million?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Alan Partridge article was lame. At absolutely no point was it suggested he was being followed by a camera crew.<br />
I have to say I like Keith Olbermann&#8217;s presenting style. How many times would you say he&#8217;s watched Good Night and Good Luck?<br />
A million?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proceed by matt</title>
		<link>http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6761</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 21:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6761</guid>
		<description>there was just a guy on bbc talking about how alan partridge "missed a great opportunity to promote Norwich."  lawl

lynne! you couldn't present a...cat!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there was just a guy on bbc talking about how alan partridge &#8220;missed a great opportunity to promote Norwich.&#8221;  lawl</p>
<p>lynne! you couldn&#8217;t present a&#8230;cat!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proceed by Graham</title>
		<link>http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6760</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6760</guid>
		<description>SodApe, fair enough, but people who write pieces with titles like 'Why Alan Partridge isn't funny', or whatever, are the bottom row of bricks on the tosser pyramid, as far as I'm concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SodApe, fair enough, but people who write pieces with titles like &#8216;Why Alan Partridge isn&#8217;t funny&#8217;, or whatever, are the bottom row of bricks on the tosser pyramid, as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proceed by Dorothy Peevis</title>
		<link>http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6759</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy Peevis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6759</guid>
		<description>Sorry about using the word "shitcom"
No exuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about using the word &#8220;shitcom&#8221;<br />
No exuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proceed by Dorothy Peevis</title>
		<link>http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6758</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy Peevis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6758</guid>
		<description>There's room everywhere for everything Sod.

How about a shitcom about a washing machine that's a twat.
Or a lime with a story to tell.
A flightless bear.

Glibby's on a roll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s room everywhere for everything Sod.</p>
<p>How about a shitcom about a washing machine that&#8217;s a twat.<br />
Or a lime with a story to tell.<br />
A flightless bear.</p>
<p>Glibby&#8217;s on a roll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proceed by AstonishingSodApe</title>
		<link>http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6757</link>
		<dc:creator>AstonishingSodApe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6757</guid>
		<description>I like nothing better than to laugh at something that's just plain funny, without feeling the need to ruin it by analysing it to death. But on the other hand, I don't think there's anything wrong with having a serious discussion about what might and might not work in comedy. Unless I missed a memo, it's not a bad thing to occasionally discuss comedy beyond simply saying, "Did you see that bit? It was funny."

Note: I said "occasionally".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like nothing better than to laugh at something that&#8217;s just plain funny, without feeling the need to ruin it by analysing it to death. But on the other hand, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything wrong with having a serious discussion about what might and might not work in comedy. Unless I missed a memo, it&#8217;s not a bad thing to occasionally discuss comedy beyond simply saying, &#8220;Did you see that bit? It was funny.&#8221;</p>
<p>Note: I said &#8220;occasionally&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proceed by matt</title>
		<link>http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6756</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 18:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6756</guid>
		<description>new sitcom idea.....  "murder she writ."  its about a remedial english teacher who solves crimes in her spare time..
potential???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new sitcom idea&#8230;..  &#8220;murder she writ.&#8221;  its about a remedial english teacher who solves crimes in her spare time..<br />
potential???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proceed by Blake</title>
		<link>http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6755</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6755</guid>
		<description>Dear Graham, 

If you could travel to dinosaur times without any unforeseen, horrible repercussions messing up the time line, what would you bring for lunch? It'd be a whole day, like as long as a work day.

-Blake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Graham, </p>
<p>If you could travel to dinosaur times without any unforeseen, horrible repercussions messing up the time line, what would you bring for lunch? It&#8217;d be a whole day, like as long as a work day.</p>
<p>-Blake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proceed by JohnnyW</title>
		<link>http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6754</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/proceed/#comment-6754</guid>
		<description>There's nothing with comedy for comedy's sake. Not everything has to have something going on under the surface. If anyone hasn't seen Iron Man, I heartily recommend it; and it's just a fun, well written, well acted, well directed super-hero movie... that doesn't have a deeper message. You could pick it to pieces if you wanted to, but it's much more fun to just sit back and enjoy the ride :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing with comedy for comedy&#8217;s sake. Not everything has to have something going on under the surface. If anyone hasn&#8217;t seen Iron Man, I heartily recommend it; and it&#8217;s just a fun, well written, well acted, well directed super-hero movie&#8230; that doesn&#8217;t have a deeper message. You could pick it to pieces if you wanted to, but it&#8217;s much more fun to just sit back and enjoy the ride :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
